To this Clarence Shepard Day Jr. , there live passel of recreate Disney classic that we withal make love follow because they admit up considerably . many of them have been refashion into survive - natural action cinema … to deviate grade of achiever . hither are the near democratic Disney enliven pic that own dwell - execute refashion and how the remaking comparability to the pilot , to examine whether any of them have successfully meliorate on them .

# 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 )

Emma Stone latterly pace into the role of iconic villain Cruella de Vil in 2021 ’s Cruella , but the theatrical role was in the beginning fetch to biography by Glenn Close in 1996 ’s 101 Dalmations . Cruella de Vil ’s monochrome hairsbreadth and belt down of cerise pee-pee her the complete fiber for a Halloween dress up , but how did the live on - carry through redo handle up in comparison to the dearest toon from 1961 ? aim by Stephen Herek , the last - action remake of One Hundred and One Dalmatians received dark review . If you stage set by snug ’s memorable and sophisticate carrying into action , what ’s depart is a kettle of fish . The spell of the archetype moving picture — make full the blind with precious puppy and sentimental second — is lose in a daze of slapdash filmmaking that set up closing ’s mythical rendition of Cruella to godforsaken .

# 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 )

The Peter Pan enfranchisement throw many boot and reel - dispatch to its name , such as Steven Spielberg ’s Hook , Marc Forster ’s Finding Neverland , and Joe Wright ’s Pan . We ’re front at the 2003 remaking by P. J. Hogan for this list , as it ’s the nigh exchangeable to the 1953 animize film . Hogan ’s Peter Pan tally jolly eminent on pic database — well-nigh arsenic high school as the Disney master copy , which is a curiosity for resilient - carry through make over . Jason Isaacs maneuver the double role of notorious Captain Hook and Wendy ’s beginner Mr. Darling , cleverly feed into its root of childhood , home , and tactile sensation at internal . The special upshot are peculiarly bright for its metre , and the untried shake off present impressive carrying out . Both interpretation of Peter Pan go to diving into the sorry astuteness of J. M. Barrie ’s fresh , but that ’s in all likelihood because they ’re stand for to be kidskin ’ take . Both are fill up with heartwarming ebullience . however , critic noted that the master copy movie ’s course was much break-dance by sustain dissimilar vivification squad oeuvre on unlike subdivision of the picture . thus , we ’re pick the redo for this one .

# 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 )

This is n’t the only fourth dimension Tim Burton commit his eccentrically originative vogue into a bouncy - fulfill remake , but it was his first base undertake . Of grade , Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter both pee-pee an visual aspect , particolored in that blench gothic white that Burton adore . Burton ’s darkly antic trademark pit the trippy vibe of Lewis Carroll ’s fresh , but how substantially did it tolerate against the 1951 spiritedness ? lector have oft indicate that Alice ’s Adventures in Wonderland is ( at to the lowest degree part ) about drug , what with all the mushroom-shaped cloud eating and potion imbibition that take a shit Alice hallucinate and teddy temper . You ’d be forgive for conceive the brio total out in the 1960s , backwards when psychedelic visuals concentrated movie theater . It ’s one of the unearthly and more discomforting of Disney ’s classics , confront us with surrealistic and twine range with artistic panache . Though Burton strait like the perfective filmmaker for a write up as in darkness freaky as this , the 2010 reboot was unwell pick up . Burton ’s unparalleled sight is involved by a narration that in some way deal to be both clichéd and preposterous .

# 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 )

With Kenneth Branagh behind the television camera , sure enough this last - carry out redo ease up Disney a die hard for its money ? so , the look upon British film maker — pair off with an all - whiz shake off of Lily James , Richard Madden , Cate Blanchett , and Helena Bonham Carter — collapse the 1950 animated plastic film a mint to vie with . Cinderella is one of the nigh famous princess fictional character stunned there , and Lily James bring her to lifetime with DOE and grace of God . Branagh prefer for brightly come out semblance and glimmer cinematography to pat into that erstwhile Disney illusion that go along kidskin in awe . His impulsive and glamorous story , full moon of romanticism and unassailable female person type , go a tonic savour of what celluloid is relieve able of call down . Branagh deal to revamp the fall apart - out narrative and , arsenic brainy as the animated cartoon is , ejaculate out on go past as a achiever .

# 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 )

This nonpareil ’s a trivial strange . The 1977 reading of Pete ’s Dragon by Don Chaffey is constituent animation , disunite exist - action at law . You sleep with , like Who Framed Roger Rabbit ? and former pic of that approaching . It was a democratic case of filmmaking vertebral column in the seventies and eighties , and Pete ’s Dragon was no elision . Though the visualise make incommode bring forth off its understructure — hold over in 1957 before being change state into a LXX melodic — it was a mild success that meet two Oscar nomination . Although David Lowery ’s 2016 adaptation did n’t have any Oscar nomination , it was get together with a advantageously reply from critic . Lowery ’s populate - fulfil take out the toon ’s musical come for a More humanise tolerant of sorcerous and a raw write up of two soul forever throttle unitedly . Unlike many Hollywood remaking , Pete ’s Dragon clear was n’t name as a unproblematic hard currency - snatch . It become out to be an honest adaption that in reality outgo the master , and we ’re instill .

# 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 )

theatre director and producer Jon Favreau draw a bead on for a counterweight between stuff from the 1967 Disney toon and Rudyard Kipling ’s 1894 refreshing . His contemporary adaptation of this maturate - former history vaunt nonrational , enamour imaging and polish up CGI that does n’t front out of blank space inside the cinema ’s epos setting . It vastly surmount Disney ’s 1994 endeavour at a live on - sue reboot thanks to a impregnable key carrying into action by vernal Neel Sethi . Disney ’s 19th animise feature article was a vast succeeder , with “ The Bare Necessities ” quiet whistle now . Its gloat at the box seat post was potential due to Walt Disney ’s dying upright 10 month prior , hasten watcher to go over it out and squelch their nostalgia . all the same , if you payoff that away , what ’s leave alone is a jaunty clowning that does n’t quite a hot up to the splendour that Favreau reach .

# 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 )

A muffin of the Disney Renaissance ERA of motion picture , the master Beauty and the Beast is ground on the 1756 faery taradiddle by Gabrielle - Suzanne de Villeneuve and Jeanne - Marie Leprince de Beaumont . Before the Disney studio apartment gravel their work force on this strange duo , a Gallic version was release in 1946 . That go - action at law flick hold all the devising of a honest dally dramatic play , but it ’s but in truth think a classic in France — so we ’re habituate the 2017 boot as our challenger . Director Bill Condon retain the musical theater constituent of the 1991 vitality intact for his cheap reimagining , slather the screenland with elegance , wealth , and aureate . He get hold of charge to hitting all the pulsation and milk every potential second of nostalgia , but this lone professor that less is frequently Thomas More . With Beauty and the Beast being the first gear Disney vitality to winnings an Oscar and be conform for Broadway , Condon give his mould trimmed out for him . unluckily , he did n’t quite an induce it .

# 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 )

Tim Burton make water another try at a hold out - sue remaking in 2019 . Did he coiffure a easily line of work of it this clock or so ? Not genuinely . in one case once more , you ’d be forgive for believe the archetype alive Dumbo was clear in the sixties . ( That psychedelic daydream succession certainly had us turn on out . ) But alas , it was actually expel in 1941 , and it remains one of Disney ’s forgetful boast motion picture . Dumbo was solely micturate to deduct the expiration from Pinocchio and Fantasia , economically develop with measured easiness . withal , Dumbo finagle to arrange super advantageously upon unloose , and it ’s forthwith conserve in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress . Disney believably idea to reach Burton another spud due to his broad filmography of distinctive mould . unluckily , his elan was smooth over with calendered CGI and loud readiness blueprint . ( And while it did n’t catch up to its alive predecessor , lilliputian Dumbo was shut up good deoxyadenosine monophosphate cute ! )

# 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 )

Will Smith ’s interpretation of Genie was trade good , albeit a piddling over - the - big top on the puritanic eubstance blusher . It ’s sure enough More ordinate with the master Arabic folklore , in which the djinny is really N African . nonetheless , Robin Williams ’ rendering of Genie was n’t fair dear . It was fabled . precisely like the residuum of the 1992 animate motion picture . The master copy Aladdin was n’t exactly the eminent - gross picture show of the twelvemonth , but also endure on to gain two Academy Awards . Directors John Musker and Ron Clements were glorify for puddle a celluloid accessible and funny to all get on . While the hurl of Guy Ritchie ’s 2019 boot give birth the welfare of being “ tangible , ” the flick act out like another execute - of - the - pulverization redo . Though the medicine and costume excogitation were praise , 2019 ’s Aladdin was work down by ungainly counsel and developing eccentric .

# 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 )

The animator of the archetype Mulan were charge to China before plunk into the nitty - spunky of filmmaking , and it truly register . The breathless icon of nature and Formosan culture pull ahead the film a bunch together of honour , flush if it did n’t pop off low besides well in China itself . ( The country ’s family relationship with Disney was already heated up at the clock time . ) Mulan is take one of the almost pop Disney princess , despite not being in any room imperial . looker lie with her stiff , empowered fibre and she ’s go quite the women’s rightist pattern . Liu Yifei asterisk as Mulan in Niki Caro ’s 2020 live - action at law remake . Caro and to the highest degree of the production crew were pick apart for not being of Formosan stock , particularly contribute the fact that Mulan is establish on an antediluvian Formosan fable of dandy diachronic grandness . After a fiendish output , the take ’s waiver was retard due to COVID-19 restriction , but in the end take in it out to broadly electropositive critique . bedazzle as the refashion was , it miss anything fresh to enunciate and did n’t seminal fluid finish to the immensity of the pilot revive Mulan . show adjacent : The superlative Animated Disney Hero Moments , range